Monday, October 31, 2011

Lab #5: Map Projections

Equal Area Projections


Distance between Washington, D.C. and Kabul, Afghanistan
Mollweide Equal Area Projection: 7,910 miles
Bonne Equal Area Projection: 6,787 miles


Equidistant Projections


Distance between Washington, D.C. and Kabul, Afghanistan
Azimuthal Equidistant Projection: 8,419 miles
Sinusoidal Equidistant Projection: 8,095 miles


Conformal Projections



Distance between Washington, D.C. and Kabul, Afghanistan
Mercator Conformal Projection: 10,074 miles
Stereographic Conformal Projection: 9,911 miles


Map projections are essential to the functional use of geographic information.The earth is not flat, yet it is necessary to be able to observe angles, distances, and areas in more useful two-dimensional formats. Because the ideal functions of a map vary per situation, there is a wide variety of projections used in mapmaking. Three commonly used types of projections are equal area, equidistant, and conformal.


Equal area projections preserve area, and it is represented with equally-sized areas on the globe between the meridians and parallels on the map. This form of representation is important when showing distributions or other items where it is critically important to show equal area. The Mollweide projection is a common form of equal area map, and is often used when it is more important to observe distributions over global area than show accurate shape. The Bonne equal area projection is a less modernly used pseudoconical map. Pseudoconical maps are similar to conical projections except that their meridians are not constrained to straight lines. The distances recorded between Washington, D.C. and Kabul, Afghanistan on the Bonne and the Mollweide exhibit great a difference. Equal area projections are found to be not useful for preserving distance.

Equidistant projections preserve distances extending from a center reference point. This is extremely useful for situations where distance is needed to be calculated from a starting location, such as with air travel from take-off or when conducting seismic work. It is important to acknowledge that reference points are essential for determining distance in this form of projection. Therefore, different types of equidistant projections will display a variation of distances when measuring between the same two locations on the globe. However, if the reference points are similarly located you may close measurements. The azimuthal equidistant projection and the sinusoidal projection are good examples of similar measurements. The sinusoidal only preserves distances along parallels so slight variation will most likely be observed.

Conformal projections preserve local angles. The mercator projection is one of the most common types that is widely used and observed. In the past, the mercator has been useful for navigation. However, this type of projection greatly distorts size and shape of large objects. This occurs because the scale naturally increases as it displays areas from the equator to the north and south pole. Stereographic projections also preserve angles, but are more concerned with preserving the shape of circles on the globe. Distance is often skewed, but depending on reference point close measurements might be observed between two conformal projections. The mercator and the stereographic produced similar but, by no means, accurate measurements.

Lab #4: ArcGIS Tutorial



Potentials and Pitfalls:

After using ArcGIS for the first time, I was shocked at how relatively easy it was to learn basic concepts while having no prior experience in GIS software. I found that many tools were clear and easy to understand without much explanation. I noticed a wide variety of creative options, even while following a step-by-step tutorial. What was also surprising was the amount of different ways to display various forms of data. Even with the varying data and customizations, the end result was a graphic that was very easy to understand.

Without knowing what is expected of GIS software in terms of today's technological limits, it is hard to mention pitfalls except ones that relate to my brief personal experience. The only difficulty I endured happened when I tried to use the program via remote desktop. Each time I made the slightest alteration, as little as using the zoom feature, all of the data layers had to reload. It took as much as an hour for the software to perform larger actions, as I waited patiently watching the "loading" icon so I could continue. I quickly realized that it was ineffective and not going to work.

Using ArcGIS on a computer that carries the software is an entirely different experience. I found that actions were performed quickly and there was little lag. I understand that our first assignment was likely of very basic nature and that it will get more complicated and tasks will need more processing time in the future. However, the ease I experienced shows that even beginners can create informative and effective maps with ArcGIS. However, the high cost of own the program for personal use means it is probably limited to professionals who use it in their field.

Overall ArcGIS seems to be a very effective program in terms of speed and capabilities. The creative options are endless, giving the user a chance to make maps and data attractive and informative. I enjoyed the surprise of being able to produce a graphic with so much information and was extremely pleased with the way it came out.

Monday, October 10, 2011

Lab #3: Neogeography


View Scenic Hiking in Los Angeles in a larger map

Neogeography is highly effective at allowing people with no prior background in map making to communicate information in the form of a map. I was surprised at how easy it was for me to create, design, and share my information in a program with a simple interface, while still having the ability to be creative. It is a very useful tool not only in map-making, but in how we are able to communicate with others.

The pitfalls I encountered pertained mostly to the simplicity of the program. There were quite a few things I wanted to do on the map, but couldn't because "My Places" did not offer enough creative options. For example, I would have liked for the lines showing driving directions to not overlap, or at least appear only when clicked. Instead it becomes hard to tell where the lines are heading when placed on a road shared by multiple routes. I could have drawn out the lines individually, parallel to each other, but I would have been sacrificing the display of directions in word form. Such simplicity of a program is great for conveying basic ideas, but as you try to show more complex matters it becomes limited.

Pitfalls that can be encountered with neogeography in a broader sense can be assumed when taking into account the idea that anyone can display information at their own discretion. This means that a person can create a map portraying misleading or inaccurate information. This makes some forms of neogeography less valid, which ultimately reduces their ability to provide confidence in the information suggested. I see the flaws with neogeography as being relatively harmless because there are still professional map makers that can be relied upon if accuracy is imperative for the particular situation. I  consider neogeography to be a new form of communication between people, not the necessarily the future of GIS. There will always be a need for maps that are highly specific which,  due to complexity, inherently require prior knowledge to create.

Monday, October 3, 2011

Lab #2: Beverly Hills Quadrangle

1. Beverly Hills, CA


2. Canoga Park, Van Nuys, Burbank, Topanga, Hollywood, Venice, Inglewood


3. 1966


4. National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 and North American Datum of 1927


5. 1:24,000


6. a) (5 x 24000)in(1m/100cm) = 1200 m
    b) (24,000 x 5) in(1 mi/63,360 in) = 1.893 m
    c) (1 mi/24,000)(63,360 inch/mi) = 2.64 in
    d) (3 km/24,000)(100,000 cm/km) = 12.5 cm


7. 20 ft


8. a) 118° 26' 18" W, 34° 4' 28" N = 118.438° W, 34.074° N
    b) 118° 27' 27" W, 34° 0' 28" N =118.458° W, 34.008° N
    c) 118° 24' 45" W, 34° 4' 46" N = 118.413° W, 34.0794° N


9. a) 580 ft = 176.78 m
    b) 140 ft = 42.67 m
    c) 640 ft = 195.07 m


10. Zone 11


11. 3,763,000 Easting and 362,000 Northing


12. 1,000,000 sq meters


13. 


14. 14 degrees


15. North to South


16.